Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. :-). n/a. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. In practice, of course, this is impossible, and editors must instead rely on a few referees representing a cross-section of informed opinion in the field. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. Since then we have received nearly 600 manuscripts and presubmission enquiries. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . b. I regret giving them his address. So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. reach a conclusion of interest to an interdisciplinary readership. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. Later in life this person's emotional feelings about the United States might be challenged if the person reads a critical history. It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. Stage 2: Editor assigned. The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. Sometimes they are more busy. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. and JavaScript. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. you're still in the running. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? Internet Explorer). What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? Second reason: methodological approach and results. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. [CDATA[> That's it . [CDATA[// >

Motorcycle For Sale Houston Under $5000, Australian Influencer Gossip, Petition For Writ Of Mandate California Sample, Delaney Funeral Home Obituaries, Articles E